Core i5-10500T vs i7-10870H
Description
Both models i5-10500T and i7-10870H are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
487.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.77k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
19.81k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
6.29k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
14.03k (x1.16)
TOTAL
36.89k
44.9k (x1.22)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
31.21k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
151.01k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
50.13k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
8.37k (x2.24)
TOTAL
161.83k
240.71k (x1.49)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
17.17k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
25.26k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
6.7k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
13.81k (x1.21)
TOTAL
50.7k
62.95k (x1.24)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
116.68k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
187.28k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
51.52k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
8.39k (x2.25)
TOTAL
245.75k
363.87k (x1.48)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
16.14k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
24.74k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.98k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
12.7k (x1.11)
TOTAL
51.82k
59.55k (x1.15)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
117.03k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
199.88k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
50.64k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
8.23k (x2.22)
TOTAL
233.94k
375.77k (x1.61)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
30.38k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
27.95k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
6.51k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
14.37k (x1.2)
TOTAL
64.6k
79.2k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
216.18k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
210.82k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
51.57k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
8.47k (x2.27)
TOTAL
302.13k
487.05k (x1.61)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4