| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i5-9600KF


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
371.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.63k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
19.43k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
6.17k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
13.82k (x1.14)
TOTAL
36.89k
44.04k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
26.64k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
110.11k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
33.07k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
8.3k (x2.22)
TOTAL
161.83k
178.11k (x1.1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
16.5k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
24.35k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
6.54k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
13.59k (x1.19)
TOTAL
50.7k
60.98k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
93.78k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
134.47k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
32.24k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
8.22k (x2.2)
TOTAL
245.75k
268.71k (x1.09)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
16.92k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
25.44k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
6.36k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
13.25k (x1.16)
TOTAL
51.82k
61.97k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
95.51k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
143.19k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
33.85k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
8.21k (x2.21)
TOTAL
233.94k
280.77k (x1.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
30.52k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
26.54k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
6.41k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
13.87k (x1.16)
TOTAL
64.6k
77.34k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
174.66k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
154.06k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
34.11k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
8.24k (x2.21)
TOTAL
302.13k
371.08k (x1.23)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4