| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i5-5675R


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
40671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.14k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
14.35k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
4.94k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
5.47k (x0.45)
TOTAL
36.89k
28.91k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
16.02k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
54.6k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
18.69k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
16.87k (x4.51)
TOTAL
161.83k
106.18k (x0.66)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
12.86k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
16.85k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.19k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
5.49k (x0.48)
TOTAL
50.7k
40.39k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
50.07k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
64.61k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
19.84k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
17.09k (x4.58)
TOTAL
245.75k
151.6k (x0.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
12.88k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
18.27k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.12k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
5.45k (x0.48)
TOTAL
51.82k
41.72k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
49.91k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
70.3k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
19.69k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
16.92k (x4.57)
TOTAL
233.94k
156.83k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
21.91k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
18.59k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.2k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
5.72k (x0.48)
TOTAL
64.6k
51.43k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
84.92k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
72.09k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
20.13k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
17.07k (x4.57)
TOTAL
302.13k
194.2k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4