| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i5-4690


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.8 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
163.95k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
22.97k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
13.02k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.21k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
4.74k (x0.4)
TOTAL
64.6k
45.95k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
85.98k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
49.01k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
19.5k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
9.46k (x2.53)
TOTAL
302.13k
163.95k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
1952 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4