| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i5-3320M


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 233.9 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 4 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
58.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.21k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
9.05k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
3.94k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
3.93k (x0.32)
TOTAL
36.89k
20.13k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
6.08k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
19.02k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
8.85k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.98k (x1.06)
TOTAL
161.83k
37.93k (x0.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
10.89k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
9.77k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
3.98k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
3.77k (x0.33)
TOTAL
50.7k
28.4k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
20.23k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
20.83k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
9.49k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
4.04k (x1.08)
TOTAL
245.75k
54.6k (x0.22)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
10.64k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
10.53k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
4.07k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
3.97k (x0.35)
TOTAL
51.82k
29.22k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
21.27k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
23.93k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
9.48k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
4.12k (x1.11)
TOTAL
233.94k
58.81k (x0.25)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2354 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3304 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
6684 points/W
1680 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3687 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5571 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3005 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
13636 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4