Core i5-10500T vs i5-2430M
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 233.9 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 5.7 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 233.9 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 5.7 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
22.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
40.76k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
8.04k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
7.37k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
3.53k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
3.27k (x0.29)
TOTAL
51.82k
22.21k (x0.43)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
15.74k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
14.05k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
7.16k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
3.81k (x1.03)
TOTAL
233.94k
40.76k (x0.17)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
2354 points/W
450 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3304 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/W
205 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
6684 points/W
1165 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
3687 points/GHz
2680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5571 points/GHz
2458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3005 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
TOTAL
13636 points/GHz
7404 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4