Core i5-10500T vs i5-10400T
Description
Both models i5-10500T and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
14.19k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
4.62k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
11.03k (x0.91)
TOTAL
36.89k
33.84k (x0.92)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
22.77k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
96.59k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
31.65k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
2.45k (x0.66)
TOTAL
161.83k
153.46k (x0.95)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
12.61k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
17.94k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
4.83k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
10.81k (x0.95)
TOTAL
50.7k
46.19k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
74.62k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
119.63k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
32.65k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
2.52k (x0.68)
TOTAL
245.75k
229.42k (x0.93)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
12.5k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
19.05k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
4.72k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
10.3k (x0.9)
TOTAL
51.82k
46.57k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
74.58k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
126.96k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
31.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
2.5k (x0.67)
TOTAL
233.94k
235.8k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
22k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
19.98k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.57k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
11.31k (x0.94)
TOTAL
64.6k
57.85k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
136.69k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
135.25k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
32.76k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
2.48k (x0.66)
TOTAL
302.13k
307.18k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4