Core i5-10500T vs i5-10210U
Description
Both models i5-10500T and i5-10210U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
22.96k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
20.8k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.76k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
7.5k (x0.63)
TOTAL
64.6k
56.03k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
66.43k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
62.38k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
14.52k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
4.45k (x1.19)
TOTAL
302.13k
147.78k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4