Core i5-10500T vs i3-7100
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.4 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i3-7100 gets 126.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.4 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
58.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
126.47k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.01k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
16.38k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.31k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
3.98k (x0.33)
TOTAL
36.89k
29.69k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
8.1k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
38.7k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
12.69k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.76k (x1)
TOTAL
161.83k
63.24k (x0.39)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
14.04k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
20.55k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.41k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
3.99k (x0.35)
TOTAL
50.7k
43.99k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
30.09k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
47.84k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
13.13k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.52k (x0.94)
TOTAL
245.75k
94.59k (x0.38)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
14.41k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
22.38k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.45k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
4.96k (x0.43)
TOTAL
51.82k
47.21k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
30.48k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
52.08k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
12.97k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
4.56k (x1.23)
TOTAL
233.94k
100.1k (x0.43)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
25.77k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
23.26k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.43k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
4.09k (x0.34)
TOTAL
64.6k
58.55k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
54.98k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
54.73k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
13.12k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.65k (x0.98)
TOTAL
302.13k
126.47k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
2480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5964 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1049 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
15014 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4