Core i5-10500T vs i3-6100
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.7 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.7 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
112.28k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.81k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
15.65k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.14k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
4.28k (x0.35)
TOTAL
36.89k
28.89k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
7.75k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
37.33k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
12.13k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.56k (x0.95)
TOTAL
161.83k
60.77k (x0.38)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
13.76k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
19.96k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.44k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
4.4k (x0.39)
TOTAL
50.7k
43.55k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
28.99k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
45.75k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
12.72k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.68k (x0.99)
TOTAL
245.75k
91.14k (x0.37)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
13.78k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
21.21k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.2k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
3.73k (x0.33)
TOTAL
51.82k
43.92k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
29.02k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
49.55k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
12.3k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
3.28k (x0.88)
TOTAL
233.94k
94.15k (x0.4)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
22.89k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
21.04k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.9k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
4.01k (x0.33)
TOTAL
64.6k
52.84k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
50.05k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
47.13k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
11.38k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.72k (x0.99)
TOTAL
302.13k
112.28k (x0.37)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4