Core i5-10500T vs Celeron N4120
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 245.7 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 5.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 245.7 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 5.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
706a8
Core
Comet Lake-S
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
5.94k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
7.51k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
2.78k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
2.67k (x0.23)
TOTAL
50.7k
18.9k (x0.37)
Multithread
i5-10500T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
15.02k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
19.77k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
7.71k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.67k (x0.98)
TOTAL
245.75k
46.17k (x0.19)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
2348 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3550 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1017 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
7021 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3669 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5267 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3002 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
13341 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4