Core i5-10500T vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.8 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.8 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
24.34k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
26.8k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
12.12k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
26.55k (x2.22)
TOTAL
64.6k
89.82k (x1.39)
Multithread
i5-10500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
263.12k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
353.9k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
159.07k (x4.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
64.01k (x17.14)
TOTAL
302.13k
840.11k (x2.78)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4