| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs Ryzen 5 5600X


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
435.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
23.28k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
25.58k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
11.72k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
25.45k (x2.13)
TOTAL
64.6k
86.03k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-10500T

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
135.28k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
180.56k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
80.27k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
38.94k (x10.43)
TOTAL
302.13k
435.05k (x1.44)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
6693 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4