Core i5-10500T vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.2k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
17.36k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
7.5k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
23.79k (x1.96)
TOTAL
36.89k
52.85k (x1.43)
Multithread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
22.11k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
108.04k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
56.81k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
36.39k (x9.74)
TOTAL
161.83k
223.36k (x1.38)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
15.38k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
21.94k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
7.97k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
24.76k (x2.17)
TOTAL
50.7k
70.05k (x1.38)
Multithread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
96.91k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
135.12k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
70.39k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
56.43k (x15.13)
TOTAL
245.75k
358.85k (x1.46)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
15.04k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
20.95k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
8.57k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
21.71k (x1.9)
TOTAL
51.82k
66.27k (x1.28)
Multithread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
94.36k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
141.73k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
69.38k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
32.72k (x8.83)
TOTAL
233.94k
338.19k (x1.45)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
16.04k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
24.47k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
8.38k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
21.66k (x1.81)
TOTAL
64.6k
70.55k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
113.63k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
143.55k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
63.84k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
27.34k (x7.32)
TOTAL
302.13k
348.35k (x1.15)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4