Core i5-10500T vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.8k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
17.38k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
5.17k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
3.16k (x0.26)
TOTAL
36.89k
29.52k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
15.28k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
76.44k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
27.48k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.02k (x0.81)
TOTAL
161.83k
122.2k (x0.76)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
13.95k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
20.7k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.33k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
3.03k (x0.27)
TOTAL
50.7k
43.01k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
58.56k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
92.95k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
28.55k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
2.98k (x0.8)
TOTAL
245.75k
183.04k (x0.74)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
13.04k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
22.35k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5.37k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
3.4k (x0.3)
TOTAL
51.82k
44.15k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
56.49k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
100.74k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
28.21k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
3.04k (x0.82)
TOTAL
233.94k
188.49k (x0.81)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
14.2k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
23.23k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.35k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
5.18k (x0.43)
TOTAL
64.6k
47.96k (x0.74)
Multithread
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
58.24k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
105.72k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
28.73k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
5.59k (x1.5)
TOTAL
302.13k
198.27k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4