| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-11700F


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
32.55k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
26.95k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
10.76k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
19.32k (x1.61)
TOTAL
64.6k
89.58k (x1.39)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
232.06k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
203.56k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
72.89k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.81k (x1.02)
TOTAL
302.13k
512.32k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4