| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.26k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
19.54k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
10.95k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
11.08k (x0.91)
TOTAL
36.89k
45.84k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
15.69k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
68.3k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
33.66k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
12.16k (x3.25)
TOTAL
161.83k
129.81k (x0.8)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
14.48k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
24.18k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
11.95k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
11.01k (x0.97)
TOTAL
50.7k
61.62k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
50.98k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
80.7k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
36.61k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
12.02k (x3.22)
TOTAL
245.75k
180.32k (x0.73)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
16.27k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
25.74k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
11.5k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
10.82k (x0.95)
TOTAL
51.82k
64.32k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
54k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
88.76k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
35.23k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
12.14k (x3.27)
TOTAL
233.94k
190.12k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
22.97k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
21.61k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
8.99k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
8.52k (x0.71)
TOTAL
64.6k
62.1k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
82.75k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
86.58k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
29.34k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
11.72k (x3.14)
TOTAL
302.13k
210.4k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4