Core i5-10500H vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
8 /16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
8.76k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
7.35k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
3.86k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
3.32k (x0.28)
TOTAL
57.69k
23.28k (x0.4)
Multithread
i5-10500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
78.51k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
66.46k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
36.42k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
3.88k (x0.72)
TOTAL
295.96k
185.26k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1498 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2376 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
596 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
4553 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3524 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5350 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1320 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2627 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
12820 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4