Core i5-10500H vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
6.95k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
6.24k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
3.05k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
2.56k (x0.22)
TOTAL
57.69k
18.8k (x0.33)
Multithread
i5-10500H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
90.01k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
82.43k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
42.59k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
9.66k (x1.79)
TOTAL
295.96k
224.7k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
1498 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2376 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
596 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
4553 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3524 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5350 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1320 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2627 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
12820 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4