Core i5-10500H vs Xeon E5-1660 v4
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
320.49k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
12.41k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
17.23k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
4.89k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
3.07k (x0.26)
TOTAL
57.69k
37.6k (x0.65)
Multithread
i5-10500H
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
102.11k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
156.5k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
42.08k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
19.8k (x3.66)
TOTAL
295.96k
320.49k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1498 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2376 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
596 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
4553 points/W
2289 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3524 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5350 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1320 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2627 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
12820 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4