| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.8 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
1.97k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
8.15k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
2.37k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
4.84k (x0.39)
TOTAL
41.26k
17.32k (x0.42)

Multithread

i5-10500H

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
15.73k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
64.78k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
18.06k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.21k (x0.98)
TOTAL
191.41k
103.77k (x0.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
12.92k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
10.97k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
2.54k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
5.09k (x0.4)
TOTAL
72.1k
31.52k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-10500H

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
103.33k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
87.67k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
20.1k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
4.91k (x0.93)
TOTAL
378.99k
216.02k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4