Core i5-10500H vs m7-6Y75
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 5.5 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 5.5 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
406e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
10.24k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
15.33k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
2.97k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
5.32k (x0.45)
TOTAL
57.69k
33.86k (x0.59)
Multithread
i5-10500H
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
16.78k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
25.09k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
6.14k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.58k (x1.03)
TOTAL
295.96k
53.58k (x0.18)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1498 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2376 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
596 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
4553 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3524 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5350 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1320 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2627 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
12820 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4