| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i7-950


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 290.9 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 3.8 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
76.29k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
8.01k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
5.38k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
3.11k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
2.96k (x0.24)
TOTAL
57.21k
19.46k (x0.34)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
31.53k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
24.16k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
15.84k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
4.75k (x0.9)
TOTAL
290.85k
76.29k (x0.26)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2294 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
610 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
4475 points/W
587 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3531 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5054 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1353 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2776 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
12713 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4