| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i7-9700F


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 290.9 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
4.67k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
17.16k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
5.7k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
14.37k (x1.15)
TOTAL
41.26k
41.9k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
26.31k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
97.53k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
31.53k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
8.94k (x1.69)
TOTAL
191.41k
164.31k (x0.86)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
16.8k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
24.08k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
6.06k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
13.98k (x1.12)
TOTAL
57.21k
60.93k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
92.79k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
135.13k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
33.29k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
8.64k (x1.64)
TOTAL
290.85k
269.85k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2294 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
610 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
4475 points/W
4152 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3531 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5054 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1353 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2776 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
12713 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4