| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
3.88k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
14.98k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
9.7k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
8.6k (x0.69)
TOTAL
41.26k
37.15k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
14.61k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
54.9k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
27.58k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.04k (x0.95)
TOTAL
191.41k
102.13k (x0.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
12.89k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
18.55k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
9.93k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
9.54k (x0.76)
TOTAL
57.21k
50.91k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
50.06k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
66.1k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
20.24k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.51k (x1.04)
TOTAL
290.85k
141.91k (x0.49)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
13.58k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
19.53k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
9.37k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
9.23k (x0.78)
TOTAL
57.69k
51.7k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
56.25k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
73.73k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
29.56k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.39k (x1)
TOTAL
295.96k
164.94k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
21.5k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
17.71k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
7.92k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
8.24k (x0.64)
TOTAL
72.1k
55.37k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
73.03k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
68.19k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
24.89k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.54k (x1.05)
TOTAL
378.99k
171.65k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4