| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 290.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.7 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
706a1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2020
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
1.68k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
5.29k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
2.75k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
3.44k (x0.27)
TOTAL
41.26k
13.16k (x0.32)

Multithread

i5-10500H

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
6.39k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
20.02k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
10.22k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
4.94k (x0.93)
TOTAL
191.41k
41.57k (x0.22)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
4.9k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
7.26k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
2.75k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
3.32k (x0.27)
TOTAL
57.21k
18.22k (x0.32)

Multithread

i5-10500H

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
18.84k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
27.45k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
10.35k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
4.85k (x0.92)
TOTAL
290.85k
61.49k (x0.21)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2294 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
610 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
4475 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3531 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5054 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1353 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2776 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12713 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4