| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs Ryzen 7 3800XT


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
508.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
17.57k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
27.38k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
9.35k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
23.9k (x1.86)
TOTAL
72.1k
78.2k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-10500H

3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
176.08k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
219.88k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
100k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
12.93k (x2.46)
TOTAL
378.99k
508.89k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
4847 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4