| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
410.47k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
4.14k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
19.07k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
5.77k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
18.28k (x1.46)
TOTAL
41.26k
47.26k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-10500H

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
34.48k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
169.65k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
63.68k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
8.2k (x1.55)
TOTAL
191.41k
276.01k (x1.44)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
15.11k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
23.46k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
5.64k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
17.52k (x1.48)
TOTAL
57.69k
61.72k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-10500H

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
119.5k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
198.79k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
59.75k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
11.58k (x2.14)
TOTAL
295.96k
389.62k (x1.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
15.02k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
24.26k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
5.53k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
16.26k (x1.27)
TOTAL
72.1k
61.07k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-10500H

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
122.92k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
220.32k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
59.78k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
7.44k (x1.42)
TOTAL
378.99k
410.47k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4