| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
13.95k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
22.02k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
5.17k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
16.61k (x1.41)
TOTAL
57.69k
57.75k (x1)

Multithread

i5-10500H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
120.59k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
197.34k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
56.83k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
6.41k (x1.19)
TOTAL
295.96k
381.16k (x1.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
12.65k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
20.95k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
4.63k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
14.47k (x1.13)
TOTAL
72.1k
52.69k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-10500H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
101.78k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
177.57k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
47.18k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.78k (x1.29)
TOTAL
378.99k
333.31k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4