Core i5-10500H vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
18.57k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
22.03k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
9.55k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
20.5k (x1.6)
TOTAL
72.1k
70.65k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-10500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
92.92k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
128.4k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
54.82k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.13k (x0.98)
TOTAL
378.99k
281.26k (x0.74)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4