| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.9 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
3.8k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
17.38k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
5.17k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
3.16k (x0.25)
TOTAL
41.26k
29.52k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-10500H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
15.28k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
76.44k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
27.48k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
3.02k (x0.57)
TOTAL
191.41k
122.2k (x0.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
13.95k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
20.7k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
5.33k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
3.03k (x0.24)
TOTAL
57.21k
43.01k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-10500H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
58.56k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
92.95k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
28.55k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
2.98k (x0.56)
TOTAL
290.85k
183.04k (x0.63)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
13.04k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
22.35k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
5.37k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
3.4k (x0.29)
TOTAL
57.69k
44.15k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-10500H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
56.49k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
100.74k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
28.21k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
3.04k (x0.56)
TOTAL
295.96k
188.49k (x0.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
14.2k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
23.23k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
5.35k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
5.18k (x0.4)
TOTAL
72.1k
47.96k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-10500H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
58.24k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
105.72k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
28.73k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.59k (x1.06)
TOTAL
378.99k
198.27k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4