| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
3.75k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
17.22k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
9.79k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
8.21k (x0.65)
TOTAL
41.26k
38.97k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
9.19k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
35.47k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
19.14k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.82k (x1.1)
TOTAL
191.41k
69.62k (x0.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
12.9k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
21.4k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
10.73k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
8.16k (x0.65)
TOTAL
57.21k
53.19k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
30.31k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
45.13k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
20.17k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.77k (x1.09)
TOTAL
290.85k
101.38k (x0.35)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
14.65k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
21.57k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
9.93k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
8.02k (x0.68)
TOTAL
57.69k
54.18k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
32.14k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
43.54k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
19.58k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.61k (x1.04)
TOTAL
295.96k
100.87k (x0.34)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
24.25k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
21.63k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
9.09k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
7.23k (x0.56)
TOTAL
72.1k
62.19k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
56.9k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
55.68k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
19.29k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.09k (x1.16)
TOTAL
378.99k
137.96k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4