Core i5-10500 vs i5-10400T
Description
Both models i5-10500 and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
14.19k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
4.62k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
11.03k (x0.78)
TOTAL
42.82k
33.84k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
22.77k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
96.59k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
31.65k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
2.45k (x0.32)
TOTAL
191.54k
153.46k (x0.8)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
12.61k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
17.94k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
4.83k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
10.81k (x0.77)
TOTAL
59.79k
46.19k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
74.62k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
119.63k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
32.65k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
2.52k (x0.32)
TOTAL
288.77k
229.42k (x0.79)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
12.5k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
19.05k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.72k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
10.3k (x0.75)
TOTAL
60.69k
46.57k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
74.58k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
126.96k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
31.76k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
2.5k (x0.32)
TOTAL
297.94k
235.8k (x0.79)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
22k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
19.98k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
4.57k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
11.31k (x0.78)
TOTAL
75.27k
57.85k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
136.69k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
135.25k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
32.76k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
2.48k (x0.3)
TOTAL
387.99k
307.18k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4