| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
23.2k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
21.2k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
9.4k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
11.54k (x0.8)
TOTAL
75.27k
65.35k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-10500

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
94.68k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
103.38k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
35.79k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
9.33k (x1.12)
TOTAL
387.99k
243.18k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i5-10500
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4