Core i5-10500 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
14.87k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
21.53k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
8.39k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
8.21k (x0.57)
TOTAL
75.27k
53k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-10500
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
124.63k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
158.62k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
69.79k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
7.53k (x0.91)
TOTAL
387.99k
360.57k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i5-10500
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4