Core i5-10500 vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
16.59k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
23.51k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
9.38k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
7.98k (x0.55)
TOTAL
75.27k
57.47k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-10500
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
152.43k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
195.79k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
83.2k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
5.38k (x0.65)
TOTAL
387.99k
436.8k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i5-10500
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4