Core i5-10500 vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
497.74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.47k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
17.41k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
8.23k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
25.15k (x1.77)
TOTAL
42.82k
55.26k (x1.29)
Multithread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
36.1k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
178.65k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
95.98k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
16.03k (x2.09)
TOTAL
191.54k
326.76k (x1.71)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
17.17k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
25.32k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
8.36k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
27.86k (x1.98)
TOTAL
59.79k
78.71k (x1.32)
Multithread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
136.06k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
195.06k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
97.81k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
12.91k (x1.66)
TOTAL
288.77k
441.85k (x1.53)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
16.76k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
25.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
8.76k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
24.3k (x1.78)
TOTAL
60.69k
74.98k (x1.24)
Multithread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
131.36k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
198.51k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
97.27k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
13.4k (x1.73)
TOTAL
297.94k
440.54k (x1.48)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
17.1k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.59k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
8.91k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
23.21k (x1.61)
TOTAL
75.27k
75.81k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
172.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
214.03k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
97.1k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
14.57k (x1.75)
TOTAL
387.99k
497.74k (x1.28)
Performance/W
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4