Core i5-10500 vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.25k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
19.72k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
5.84k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
21.36k (x1.5)
TOTAL
42.82k
51.17k (x1.19)
Multithread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
35.04k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
181.42k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
64.86k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
8.21k (x1.07)
TOTAL
191.54k
289.54k (x1.51)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
15.22k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
24.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
5.87k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
21k (x1.49)
TOTAL
59.79k
66.21k (x1.11)
Multithread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
126.81k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
229.86k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
61.74k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
9.77k (x1.26)
TOTAL
288.77k
428.19k (x1.48)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
14.44k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
24.92k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.8k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
19.07k (x1.4)
TOTAL
60.69k
64.24k (x1.06)
Multithread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
122.01k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
220.34k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
59.89k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
9.9k (x1.28)
TOTAL
297.94k
412.13k (x1.38)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
15.34k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
25.75k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
5.79k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
17.95k (x1.24)
TOTAL
75.27k
64.83k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
123.07k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
239.3k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
60.6k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
8.18k (x0.98)
TOTAL
387.99k
431.14k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4