Core i5-10500 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.2k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
17.36k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
7.5k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
23.79k (x1.68)
TOTAL
42.82k
52.85k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
22.11k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
108.04k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
56.81k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
36.39k (x4.74)
TOTAL
191.54k
223.36k (x1.17)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
15.38k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
21.94k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
7.97k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
24.76k (x1.76)
TOTAL
59.79k
70.05k (x1.17)
Multithread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
96.91k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
135.12k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
70.39k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
56.43k (x7.25)
TOTAL
288.77k
358.85k (x1.24)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
15.04k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
20.95k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
8.57k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
21.71k (x1.59)
TOTAL
60.69k
66.27k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
94.36k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
141.73k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
69.38k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
32.72k (x4.22)
TOTAL
297.94k
338.19k (x1.14)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
16.04k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
24.47k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
8.38k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
21.66k (x1.5)
TOTAL
75.27k
70.55k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
113.63k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
143.55k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
63.84k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
27.34k (x3.29)
TOTAL
387.99k
348.35k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4