| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 2.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.95k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
18.36k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
5.39k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
17.35k (x1.22)
TOTAL
42.82k
45.06k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-10500

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
19.47k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
77.19k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
15.4k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
12.25k (x1.6)
TOTAL
191.54k
124.3k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
14.63k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
24.09k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
5.51k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
15.86k (x1.1)
TOTAL
75.27k
60.09k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-10500

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
48.75k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
80.1k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
24.5k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
19.85k (x2.39)
TOTAL
387.99k
173.2k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i5-10500
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4