Core i5-10400T vs Xeon W3530
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
7.51k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
4.93k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
3.02k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
2.74k (x0.25)
TOTAL
46.19k
18.2k (x0.39)
Multithread
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
31.33k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
23.11k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
15.78k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.55k (x1.01)
TOTAL
229.42k
72.77k (x0.32)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4