| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Xeon W3530


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2010

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
7513 (-40.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
4930 (-72.52%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
3024 (-37.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
2736 (-74.70%)
TOTAL
46191
18203 (-60.59%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
31335 (-58.01%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
23108 (-80.68%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
15777 (-51.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
2555 (1.38%)
TOTAL
229416
72775 (-68.28%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
560 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9