Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
3.52k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
8.68k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
2.83k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
3.13k (x0.28)
TOTAL
33.84k
18.17k (x0.54)
Multithread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
32.7k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
105.18k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
35.18k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
9.54k (x3.89)
TOTAL
153.46k
182.59k (x1.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
11.08k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
9.57k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
3.18k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
3.28k (x0.3)
TOTAL
46.19k
27.11k (x0.59)
Multithread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
139.07k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
133.47k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
46.6k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
6.65k (x2.64)
TOTAL
229.42k
325.78k (x1.42)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
11.18k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
10.06k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.21k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
3.12k (x0.3)
TOTAL
46.57k
27.57k (x0.59)
Multithread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
140.98k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
145.37k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
45.62k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
6.75k (x2.7)
TOTAL
235.8k
338.73k (x1.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
18.62k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
10.49k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.04k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
3.26k (x0.29)
TOTAL
57.85k
36.41k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
236.25k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
151.05k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
58.9k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.7k (x2.7)
TOTAL
307.18k
452.9k (x1.47)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4