Core i5-10400T vs i7-4930K
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4930K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the i7-4930K gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4930K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the i7-4930K gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4930K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-E
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
32.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
12k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
11.35k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.53k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
4.35k (x0.42)
TOTAL
46.57k
32.22k (x0.69)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
72.46k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
80.33k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
33.44k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
12.03k (x4.82)
TOTAL
235.8k
198.27k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
557 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
618 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
1525 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
2910 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
8262 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4