Core i5-10400T vs i5-8259U
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
229k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
21.06k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
19.79k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.72k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
8.98k (x0.79)
TOTAL
57.85k
54.55k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
96.43k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
85.46k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
22.31k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
24.81k (x10.01)
TOTAL
307.18k
229k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
8179 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4