Core i5-10400T vs i5-4670K
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4670K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
42.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
140.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
21.79k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
11.49k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.73k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
4.25k (x0.38)
TOTAL
57.85k
42.25k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
75.9k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
40.88k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
17.08k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.32k (x2.55)
TOTAL
307.18k
140.18k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
203 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
1669 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11120 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4