| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.05k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
15.29k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
9.04k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
10.54k (x0.96)
TOTAL
33.84k
38.92k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
9.05k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
33.88k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
15.34k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
6.74k (x2.75)
TOTAL
153.46k
65.01k (x0.42)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
7.07k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
10.55k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.27k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
5.66k (x0.52)
TOTAL
46.19k
28.56k (x0.62)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
25.28k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
37.48k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
17.77k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
6.92k (x2.75)
TOTAL
229.42k
87.45k (x0.38)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
13.9k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
20.13k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
9.41k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
10.59k (x1.03)
TOTAL
46.57k
54.03k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
55.4k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
59.01k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
22.83k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
6.7k (x2.68)
TOTAL
235.8k
143.94k (x0.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
25.53k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
19.99k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
9.31k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
10.81k (x0.96)
TOTAL
57.85k
65.64k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
58.46k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
57.31k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
20.1k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.81k (x2.75)
TOTAL
307.18k
142.69k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4