Core i5-10400T vs i3-10110U
Description
Both models i5-10400T and i3-10110U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
106.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.26k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
15.48k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
4.94k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
4.31k (x0.39)
TOTAL
33.84k
28.98k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
7.41k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
29.18k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
10.26k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
3.27k (x1.34)
TOTAL
153.46k
50.13k (x0.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
14.3k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
20.09k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.23k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
4.24k (x0.39)
TOTAL
46.19k
43.87k (x0.95)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
25.51k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
41.33k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
10.81k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.21k (x1.27)
TOTAL
229.42k
80.85k (x0.35)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
14.25k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
21.55k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.16k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
4.26k (x0.41)
TOTAL
46.57k
45.22k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
26.15k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
44.03k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
10.71k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.28k (x1.31)
TOTAL
235.8k
84.17k (x0.36)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
24.6k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
22.32k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.02k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
4.7k (x0.42)
TOTAL
57.85k
56.64k (x0.98)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
47.98k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
44.28k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
10.33k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
3.98k (x1.6)
TOTAL
307.18k
106.58k (x0.35)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4