Core i5-10400T vs i3-10105
Description
Both models i5-10400T and i3-10105 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.5k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
18.39k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.78k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.03k
8.3k (x0.75)
TOTAL
33.84k
36.97k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
22.77k
16.13k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
96.59k
75.62k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.65k
27.88k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
3.57k (x1.46)
TOTAL
153.46k
123.2k (x0.8)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
16.19k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
23.07k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
6.04k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
8.46k (x0.78)
TOTAL
46.19k
53.77k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
57.59k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
100.63k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
28.59k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.56k (x1.41)
TOTAL
229.42k
190.38k (x0.83)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
16.11k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
19.05k
24.12k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.71k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.3k
7.89k (x0.77)
TOTAL
46.57k
53.83k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
74.58k
58.25k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
126.96k
105.73k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.76k
27.8k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.51k (x1.4)
TOTAL
235.8k
195.29k (x0.83)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
28.9k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
25.85k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.88k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
8.29k (x0.73)
TOTAL
57.85k
68.92k (x1.19)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
111.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
110.23k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
28.45k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
3.56k (x1.44)
TOTAL
307.18k
253.93k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4