Core i5-10400T vs i3-10100
Description
Both models i5-10400T and i3-10100 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
22.74k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
20.31k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.71k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
7.65k (x0.68)
TOTAL
57.85k
55.41k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
71.95k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
67.7k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
16.43k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.25k (x2.52)
TOTAL
307.18k
162.33k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4