Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
21.2k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
25k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
11.44k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
24.22k (x2.14)
TOTAL
57.85k
81.87k (x1.42)
Multithread
i5-10400T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
145.13k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
198.36k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
85.67k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
5.79k (x2.34)
TOTAL
307.18k
434.96k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4